IN RE PETITION OF LUDMILA A. TSYMBAL, 11-3054 (FLW). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. New Jersey
Number: infdco20120717a88
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION FREDA L. WOLFSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon a Petition by Petitioner Ludmila A. Tysmbal ("Petitioner") to allow the depositions of Raisa Lukin and Tony Lukin ("Respondents") pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 27; it appearing that this matter was referred to the Honorable Douglas E. Arpert, U.S.M.J. for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 72 and Local Civil Rule 72.1; and Magistrate Judge Arpert having consider
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION FREDA L. WOLFSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon a Petition by Petitioner Ludmila A. Tysmbal ("Petitioner") to allow the depositions of Raisa Lukin and Tony Lukin ("Respondents") pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 27; it appearing that this matter was referred to the Honorable Douglas E. Arpert, U.S.M.J. for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 72 and Local Civil Rule 72.1; and Magistrate Judge Arpert having considere..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
FREDA L. WOLFSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon a Petition by Petitioner Ludmila A. Tysmbal ("Petitioner") to allow the depositions of Raisa Lukin and Tony Lukin ("Respondents") pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 27; it appearing that this matter was referred to the Honorable Douglas E. Arpert, U.S.M.J. for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 72 and Local Civil Rule 72.1; and Magistrate Judge Arpert having considered the moving and opposition papers pursuant to Rule 78; and for the reasons stated in his Report and Recommendation, finding that Petitioner has failed to satisfy the elements of Rule 27; it further appearing that Petitioner timely objected to Magistrate Judge Arpert's Report and Recommendation; the Court has reviewed the objection and opposition thereto filed pursuant to Rule 78; accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Opinion filed on this date; and for good cause shown:
It is on this 16th day of July, 2012,
ORDERED that the Court approves and adopts the December 9, 2011, Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Douglas E. Arpert, U.S.M.J.;
ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition (Dkt. Nos. 1 and 8) is DENIED; and
ORDERED that this case is CLOSED.
Source: Leagle
