Filed: Apr. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN D. WIGENTON, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon (1) motion by Plaintiff Shaukat Ali ("Plaintiff" or "Ali") for default judgment (July 8, 2013, ECF No. 11) and (2) cross-motion to set aside default and motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) by Jersey City Parking Authority, Pius Niko Tampusari, improperly named as "Niko Tamtasuri," and Mary F. Paretti (collectively "Defendants") (January 1, 2014, ECF No
Summary: ORDER SUSAN D. WIGENTON, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon (1) motion by Plaintiff Shaukat Ali ("Plaintiff" or "Ali") for default judgment (July 8, 2013, ECF No. 11) and (2) cross-motion to set aside default and motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) by Jersey City Parking Authority, Pius Niko Tampusari, improperly named as "Niko Tamtasuri," and Mary F. Paretti (collectively "Defendants") (January 1, 2014, ECF No...
More
ORDER
SUSAN D. WIGENTON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon (1) motion by Plaintiff Shaukat Ali ("Plaintiff" or "Ali") for default judgment (July 8, 2013, ECF No. 11) and (2) cross-motion to set aside default and motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) by Jersey City Parking Authority, Pius Niko Tampusari, improperly named as "Niko Tamtasuri," and Mary F. Paretti (collectively "Defendants") (January 1, 2014, ECF No. 18). Upon careful consideration of the submissions of the parties, and based upon the Court's Opinion filed this day;
IT IS on this 16th day of April, 2014;
ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to enter default judgment is denied;
ORDERED that Defendants' cross-motion to set aside default is granted;
ORDERED that the default entered against Defendants by the clerk of the court on June 7, 2013 is vacated;
ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss the TAC is granted;
ORDERED that Plaintiff's TAC is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice.
