welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Case Laws
  3. District Court, D. New Jersey
  4. 2016
  5. Reardon v. Segal, 15-244(NLH/JS). (2016)

Reardon v. Segal, 15-244(NLH/JS). (2016)

Court: District Court, D. New Jersey Number: infdco20160322c22 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER NOEL L. HILLMAN , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court on plaintiff's motion for default judgment [27]; and Plaintiff requesting the entry of default judgment against unspecified defendants on all his claims; but The Court noting that under Federal Civil Procedure Rule 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two-step process: first, when a defendant has failed to plead or otherwise respond, a plaintiff must request the entry of default by the
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on plaintiff's motion for default judgment [27]; and

Plaintiff requesting the entry of default judgment against unspecified defendants on all his claims; but

The Court noting that under Federal Civil Procedure Rule 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two-step process: first, when a defendant has failed to plead or otherwise respond, a plaintiff must request the entry of default by the Clerk of the Court, Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), and second, after the Clerk has entered the party's default, a plaintiff may then obtain a judgment by default by either (1) asking the Clerk to enter judgment, if the judgment is a sum certain, or (2) applying to the Court,1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b); Sourcecorp Inc. v. Croney, 412 F. App'x 455, 458 (3d Cir. 2011); but

The Court finding that plaintiff has by-passed the first step of the process;

Therefore,

IT IS on this 18th day of March, 2016

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the entry of default judgment [27] be, the same hereby is, DENIED.

FootNotes


1. The Court also notes that if plaintiff obtains a Clerk's entry of default against defendants, and then refiles his current motion for default judgment, he must do more than demonstrate that defendants have failed to appear in the action. See Franklin v. National Maritime Union of America, (MEBA/NMU), Civ. No. 91-480, 1991 WL 131182, *1 (D.N.J. July 16, 1991) (quoting 10 Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2685 (1983)) (explaining that when considering an application for entry of a default judgment under Rule 55(b)(2), the Court is "required to exercise `sound judicial discretion' in deciding whether the judgment should be entered [and] `[t]his element of discretion makes it clear that the party making the request is not entitled to a default judgment as of right, even when defendant is technically in default and that fact has been noted under Rule 55(a)'"); Comdyne I. Inc. v. Corbin, 908 F.2d 1142, 1149 (3d Cir. 1990) (explaining that even though by virtue of defendant's default, every "well-plead allegation" of the complaint, except those relating to damages, are deemed admitted, a plaintiff must articulate the substantive legal basis for a finding in its favor).
Source:  Leagle
Lawyers who claimed
No Lawyers
Citations
15-244(NLH/JS).
Counsels
  • BRIAN P. WILSON
Similar Cases

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer