Ramada Worldwide Inc. v. APM Enterprises, LLC, 15-8435. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. New Jersey
Number: infdco20160331h77
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER CLAIRE C. CECCHI , District Judge . Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff Ramada Worldwide, Inc. ("Plaintiff") for Final Judgment by Default. (ECF No. 7.) It appearing that: 1. Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this matter on December 3, 2015. (ECF No. 1.) 2. Plaintiff served the Complaint on January 24, 2016. (ECF No. 5.) 3. Defendants APM Enterprises, LLC, Avtar Grewal, and Paramjeet Brar (collectively, "Defendants") failed to file an Answer by the February 16, 2016 deadline
Summary: ORDER CLAIRE C. CECCHI , District Judge . Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff Ramada Worldwide, Inc. ("Plaintiff") for Final Judgment by Default. (ECF No. 7.) It appearing that: 1. Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this matter on December 3, 2015. (ECF No. 1.) 2. Plaintiff served the Complaint on January 24, 2016. (ECF No. 5.) 3. Defendants APM Enterprises, LLC, Avtar Grewal, and Paramjeet Brar (collectively, "Defendants") failed to file an Answer by the February 16, 2016 deadline...
More
ORDER
CLAIRE C. CECCHI, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff Ramada Worldwide, Inc. ("Plaintiff") for Final Judgment by Default. (ECF No. 7.) It appearing that:
1. Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this matter on December 3, 2015. (ECF No. 1.)
2. Plaintiff served the Complaint on January 24, 2016. (ECF No. 5.)
3. Defendants APM Enterprises, LLC, Avtar Grewal, and Paramjeet Brar (collectively, "Defendants") failed to file an Answer by the February 16, 2016 deadline. (See ECF No. 5.)
4. On February 19, 2016, Plaintiffrequested entry of default and the Clerk entered default as to Defendants for failure to plead or otherwise defend. (See ECF No. 6.)
5. On March 7, 2016, Plaintifffiled a Motion for Final Judgment by Default. (ECF No. 7.)
6. On March 28, 2016, Defendant Avtar Grewal submitted a letter to the Court on behalf of all Defendants indicating that he had retained an attorney who contacted Plaintiff's counsel but his attorney had become unreachable. (ECF No. 8.) Mr. Grewal requested that the entry of default be vacated and that he be given time to find an attorney. (Id.)
Accordingly,
IT IS on 29 this day of March, 2016,
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Final Judgment by Default is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and it is further
ORDERED the Clerk's entry of default against Defendants is hereby VACATED; and it is further
ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Defendants shall answer or file a motion.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
