Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SUDBERRY v. STATE, 14-5580 (MCA). (2016)

Court: District Court, D. New Jersey Number: infdco20160420h14 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER MADELINE COX ARLEO , District Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court by way of this Court's December 8, 2015 Order to Show Cause why Plaintiff pro se Darrail Sudberry's Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, Dkt. No. 31; and it appearing that the Honorable Michael Hammmer issued a Report and Recommendation dated March 2, 2016 in which Judge Hammer recommended that this Court dismiss Plaintiff's case for failure to prosecute, Dkt. No. 33; and it appe
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the Court by way of this Court's December 8, 2015 Order to Show Cause why Plaintiff pro se Darrail Sudberry's Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, Dkt. No. 31;

and it appearing that the Honorable Michael Hammmer issued a Report and Recommendation dated March 2, 2016 in which Judge Hammer recommended that this Court dismiss Plaintiff's case for failure to prosecute, Dkt. No. 33; and

it appearing that neither Defendants nor Plaintiff have filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation; and

it appearing that for the reasons set forth in Judge Hammer's Report and Recommendation

IT IS on this 19th day of April, 2016,

ORDERED that Judge Hammer's Report and Recommendation dated March 2, 2016, is ADOPTED and Plaintiff's case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute; and it is further

ORDERED that this case is hereby CLOSED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer