Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROSENBLATT v. THE NUPLEXA GROUP, INC., 16-1064 (ES) (SCM). (2016)

Court: District Court, D. New Jersey Number: infdco20160630e70 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2016
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER ESTHER SALAS , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff Raphael M. Rosenblatt's ("Plaintiff") motion to remand this action to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County, (D.E. No. 3); and Defendants—the Nuplexa Group, Inc. and Dennis Black (collectively, "Defendants") having opposed Plaintiff's motion to remand, (D.E. No. 5); and, on May 27, 2016, the Honorable Steven C. Mannion, United States Magistrate Judge, having issued a Re
More

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff Raphael M. Rosenblatt's ("Plaintiff") motion to remand this action to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County, (D.E. No. 3); and Defendants—the Nuplexa Group, Inc. and Dennis Black (collectively, "Defendants") having opposed Plaintiff's motion to remand, (D.E. No. 5); and, on May 27, 2016, the Honorable Steven C. Mannion, United States Magistrate Judge, having issued a Report and Recommendation (the "R & R") that the Undersigned grant Plaintiff's motion to remand and deny Plaintiff's request for certain costs, (D.E. No. 13); and, on June 3, 2016, Defendants having filed objections to the R & R, (D.E. No. 15); and the Court having considered the submissions of the parties, the R & R, and Defendants' objections to the R & R and having opted to rule without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78; and as set forth in the accompanying Opinion,

IT IS on this 29th day of June 2016,

ORDERED that the R & R, (D.E. No. 13), is ADOPTED in relevant part; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to remand, (D.E. No. 3), is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that insofar as Plaintiff's motion seeks an award of fees and costs incurred in connection with his motion, it is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants' motion for an extension of time, (D.E. No. 8), is DENIED as MOOT; and it is further

ORDERED that this matter is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County, Law Division; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer