MAHANANDIGARI v. TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, 16-8746 (JLL). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. New Jersey
Number: infdco20180112c11
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOSE L. LINARES , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the Court by way of Plaintiffs Naga Sandhya Mahanandigari and Madhu Sudan Reddy Mahanandigari's objection to Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion's Report and Recommendation dated November 9, 2017. (ECF No. 40). For the reasons set forth in the Court's corresponding Opinion, IT IS on this 11th day of January, 2018, ORDERED that the Court hereby adopts Judge Mannion's Report and Recommendation dated November 9, 201
Summary: ORDER JOSE L. LINARES , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the Court by way of Plaintiffs Naga Sandhya Mahanandigari and Madhu Sudan Reddy Mahanandigari's objection to Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion's Report and Recommendation dated November 9, 2017. (ECF No. 40). For the reasons set forth in the Court's corresponding Opinion, IT IS on this 11th day of January, 2018, ORDERED that the Court hereby adopts Judge Mannion's Report and Recommendation dated November 9, 2017..
More
ORDER
JOSE L. LINARES, Chief District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court by way of Plaintiffs Naga Sandhya Mahanandigari and Madhu Sudan Reddy Mahanandigari's objection to Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion's Report and Recommendation dated November 9, 2017. (ECF No. 40). For the reasons set forth in the Court's corresponding Opinion,
IT IS on this 11th day of January, 2018,
ORDERED that the Court hereby adopts Judge Mannion's Report and Recommendation dated November 9, 2017 (ECF No. 40) and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Reopen Case and Amend Complaint (ECF No. 35) is hereby DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that this matter shall remain CLOSED.
Source: Leagle
