Lattig v. Ozz Land, LLC, 17-6351. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. New Jersey
Number: infdco20180307d99
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER JOSEPH H. RODRIGUEZ , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff Krystal Lattig's motion seeking entry of default judgment [Dkt. No. 5] against Defendants Ozz Land, LLC, a Domestic Limited Liability Company d/b/a Deepwater Diner and Alayyiddin Ozdemir, pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and the Court having considered the written submissions filed in support of the Motion for Default Judgment; and The Court finding that
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER JOSEPH H. RODRIGUEZ , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff Krystal Lattig's motion seeking entry of default judgment [Dkt. No. 5] against Defendants Ozz Land, LLC, a Domestic Limited Liability Company d/b/a Deepwater Diner and Alayyiddin Ozdemir, pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and the Court having considered the written submissions filed in support of the Motion for Default Judgment; and The Court finding that ..
More
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JOSEPH H. RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.
This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff Krystal Lattig's motion seeking entry of default judgment [Dkt. No. 5] against Defendants Ozz Land, LLC, a Domestic Limited Liability Company d/b/a Deepwater Diner and Alayyiddin Ozdemir, pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and the Court having considered the written submissions filed in support of the Motion for Default Judgment; and
The Court finding that Plaintiff's submission is deficient in that there is not an affidavit and/or proof showing valid service was made on the particular defendants in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and by way of incorporation, the New Jersey Court Rules governing service; and
The Court further finding that the motion is deficient in that it fails to append an affidavit of non-military service in compliance with the Soldiers and Sailors' Relief Act, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2); 50 U.S.C. App. § 501 et seq. (2006) (codification of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act of 2003); Ciasulli v. Hartmann, No. 08-5544, 2009 WL 150668, at *1 (D.N.J. Jan. 21, 2009) (citation omitted); as a result
IT IS on this 6th day of March, 2018 hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. No. 5] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
