Filed: Aug. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER KEVIN McNULTY , District Judge . The defendant, Alvogen Pine Brook, Inc., having filed a motion (ECF no. 16) to transfer venue of this action to the District of Delaware; and the matter having come before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor's Report and Recommendation (R&R) (ECF no. 50); and Alvogen Pine Brook, Inc., having filed an Objection thereto (ECF no. 54); and the plaintiffs, Indivior Inc., Indivior UK Limited, and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., having filed a respo
Summary: ORDER KEVIN McNULTY , District Judge . The defendant, Alvogen Pine Brook, Inc., having filed a motion (ECF no. 16) to transfer venue of this action to the District of Delaware; and the matter having come before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor's Report and Recommendation (R&R) (ECF no. 50); and Alvogen Pine Brook, Inc., having filed an Objection thereto (ECF no. 54); and the plaintiffs, Indivior Inc., Indivior UK Limited, and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., having filed a respon..
More
ORDER
KEVIN McNULTY, District Judge.
The defendant, Alvogen Pine Brook, Inc., having filed a motion (ECF no. 16) to transfer venue of this action to the District of Delaware; and the matter having come before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor's Report and Recommendation (R&R) (ECF no. 50); and Alvogen Pine Brook, Inc., having filed an Objection thereto (ECF no. 54); and the plaintiffs, Indivior Inc., Indivior UK Limited, and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., having filed a response in opposition (ECF no. 56); and the Court having reviewed the R&R de novo and considered the submissions and the entire case file, without oral argument; for the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion, and good cause appearing therefor;
IT IS this 27th day of August, 2018.
ORDERED as follows:
1. The objection (ECF no. 54) to the R&R is rejected;
2. The R&R (ECF no. 50) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED, essentially for the reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Waldor's Opinion, as supplemented by the accompanying Opinion of this Court;
3. The motion to transfer venue (ECF no. 16) is DENIED.
