Saroza v. Client Services, Inc., 17-3429. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. New Jersey
Number: infdco20181105879
Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER MADELINE COX ARLEO , District Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court by way of the Honorable Steven C. Mannion's Report and Recommendation dated June 8, 2018, in which Judge Mannion recommended that the Court deny Defendant's motion to compel arbitration, ECF Nos. 26, 29; and it appearing that neither Defendant nor Plaintiff in this matter have filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation; and for the reasons set forth in Judge Mannion's Report and Recommendation
Summary: ORDER MADELINE COX ARLEO , District Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court by way of the Honorable Steven C. Mannion's Report and Recommendation dated June 8, 2018, in which Judge Mannion recommended that the Court deny Defendant's motion to compel arbitration, ECF Nos. 26, 29; and it appearing that neither Defendant nor Plaintiff in this matter have filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation; and for the reasons set forth in Judge Mannion's Report and Recommendation;..
More
ORDER
MADELINE COX ARLEO, District Judge.
THIS MATTER having come before the Court by way of the Honorable Steven C. Mannion's Report and Recommendation dated June 8, 2018, in which Judge Mannion recommended that the Court deny Defendant's motion to compel arbitration, ECF Nos. 26, 29;
and it appearing that neither Defendant nor Plaintiff in this matter have filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation;
and for the reasons set forth in Judge Mannion's Report and Recommendation;
IT IS on this 31st day of October, 2018;
ORDERED that Judge Mannion's Report and Recommendation dated June 8, 2018, is ADOPTED; and it is further
ORDERED that Defendant's motion to compel arbitration is DENIED.
Source: Leagle