Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Manko, 19-423 (FLW). (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Jersey Number: infdco20190708425 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE FREDA L. WOLFSON , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of the United States, by Craig Capenito, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (R. Joseph Gribko Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendant Gulshan Manko (David Oakley, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance of proceedings in the above-captioned matter; and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have this matter brough
More

ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of the United States, by Craig Capenito, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (R. Joseph Gribko Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendant Gulshan Manko (David Oakley, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance of proceedings in the above-captioned matter; and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have this matter brought to trial within 70 days of the date of his appearance before a judicial officer of this court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1); and the defendant having consented to such continuance and having waived such right; and for good cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

1. The failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant and counsel for the Government the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation for trial, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

2. As a result of the foregoing, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B)(iv), the ends of justice served by the granting of this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this 26th day of June, 2019,

ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued until July 18, 2019; and it is further

ORDERED that the period from the date of this order through July 18, 2019 be and it hereby is excluded in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer