Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Forrest Hill Community Association & Gaytha Krauser v. PSE&G, 19-16692 (ES). (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Jersey Number: infdco20190819c83 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2019
Summary: LETTER ORDER ESTHER SALAS , District Judge . Dear Parties: The Court is in receipt of Forrest Hill Community Association & Gaytha Krauser's ("Plaintiffs'") verification and certificate of service (D.E. Nos. 4 & 5) with respect to their prior emergent application (D.E. No. 1). The Court writes to reiterate that it denied that application (D.E. No. 3); and, accordingly, "[t]here is no motion presently before the Court . . . on the subject." See, e.g., Hailey v. City of Camden, 631 F.Supp
More

LETTER ORDER

Dear Parties:

The Court is in receipt of Forrest Hill Community Association & Gaytha Krauser's ("Plaintiffs'") verification and certificate of service (D.E. Nos. 4 & 5) with respect to their prior emergent application (D.E. No. 1). The Court writes to reiterate that it denied that application (D.E. No. 3); and, accordingly, "[t]here is no motion presently before the Court . . . on the subject." See, e.g., Hailey v. City of Camden, 631 F.Supp.2d 528, 538 (D.N.J. 2009); see also Pub. Interest Research Grp. of New Jersey, Inc. v. Hercules, Inc., 830 F.Supp. 1549, 1554 n.7 (D.N.J. 1993) ("As there is currently before the court no motion . . ., we have no reason to decide this issue at the present time.").

Plaintiffs, nonetheless, are permitted to file such an application in accordance with all applicable rules. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 65; L. Civ. R. 65.1.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer