Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Haas v. Burlington County, 08-1102 (NLH/JS). (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Jersey Number: infdco20190925e31 Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER NOEL L. HILLMAN , District Judge . For the reasons expressed in the Court's Opinion filed today, IT IS on this 24th day of September , 2019 ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Schneider's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 441) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED Class Counsels' 1 Motions for Attorneys' Fees (Docket 364 and 366) be, and the same hereby are, GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court grants the applications for fees but allocates
More

ORDER

For the reasons expressed in the Court's Opinion filed today,

IT IS on this 24th day of September, 2019

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Schneider's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 441) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED Class Counsels'1 Motions for Attorneys' Fees (Docket 364 and 366) be, and the same hereby are, GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court grants the applications for fees but allocates the fee in a manner consistent with the Report and Recommendation: $742,500 to the Poplar Group and $157,500 to the Novack Group. Costs are also apportioned consistent with the Report and Recommendation: $20,068.80 to the Poplar Group and $4,931.20 to the Novack Group.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. There are two factions of class counsel involved in this case. The first group includes Attorneys Carl Poplar and William Riback ("Poplar Group") while the second group includes Attorneys David Novack and Susan Lask ("Novack Group" Collectively, the Court refers to these two groups as "Class Counsel[.]"
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer