Margulis v. Stryker Corporation, 19-10745 (SDW) (ESK). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. New Jersey
Number: infdco20191216a89
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2019
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER SUSAN D. WIGENTON , Magistrate Judge . Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") entered on November 12, 2019, by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel ("Judge Kiel"), recommending that Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for forum non conveniens be granted. Plaintiffs filed objections to the R&R on November 26, 2019, (ECF No. 33), and Defendants responded on December 10, 2019. (ECF No. 35.) This Court has reviewed the
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION ORDER SUSAN D. WIGENTON , Magistrate Judge . Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") entered on November 12, 2019, by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel ("Judge Kiel"), recommending that Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for forum non conveniens be granted. Plaintiffs filed objections to the R&R on November 26, 2019, (ECF No. 33), and Defendants responded on December 10, 2019. (ECF No. 35.) This Court has reviewed the ..
More
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
ORDER
SUSAN D. WIGENTON, Magistrate Judge.
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") entered on November 12, 2019, by Magistrate Judge Edward S. Kiel ("Judge Kiel"), recommending that Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for forum non conveniens be granted. Plaintiffs filed objections to the R&R on November 26, 2019, (ECF No. 33), and Defendants responded on December 10, 2019. (ECF No. 35.) This Court has reviewed the reasons set forth by Judge Kiel in the R&R as well as Plaintiffs' objections and Defendants' response. This Court is satisfied that Judge Kiel properly determined that this Court does not have personal jurisdiction over Defendant Stryker Corporation, and that the Complaint should be dismissed for forum non conveniens.
Based on the foregoing, and for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED that the R&R of Judge Kiel (ECF No. 32) is ADOPTED as the conclusions of law of this Court.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
