Filed: Dec. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER NOEL L. HILLMAN , District Judge . WHEREAS, the Court is in receipt of a letter captioned as an "affidavit" from Defendant Eugene Sparrow, see ECF No. 30; and WHEREAS, Defendant requests the appointment of counsel under 18 U.S.C. 3006A to investigate his claims of actual innocence based on new Supreme Court law, see id. 8; and WHEREAS, there is no right to counsel in post-conviction proceedings. See Reese v. Fulcomer , 946 F.2d 247 , 263 (3d Cir. 1991),
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER NOEL L. HILLMAN , District Judge . WHEREAS, the Court is in receipt of a letter captioned as an "affidavit" from Defendant Eugene Sparrow, see ECF No. 30; and WHEREAS, Defendant requests the appointment of counsel under 18 U.S.C. 3006A to investigate his claims of actual innocence based on new Supreme Court law, see id. 8; and WHEREAS, there is no right to counsel in post-conviction proceedings. See Reese v. Fulcomer , 946 F.2d 247 , 263 (3d Cir. 1991), ..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
NOEL L. HILLMAN, District Judge.
WHEREAS, the Court is in receipt of a letter captioned as an "affidavit" from Defendant Eugene Sparrow, see ECF No. 30; and WHEREAS, Defendant requests the appointment of counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A to investigate his claims of actual innocence based on new Supreme Court law, see id. ¶ 8; and
WHEREAS, there is no right to counsel in post-conviction proceedings. See Reese v. Fulcomer, 946 F.2d 247, 263 (3d Cir. 1991), superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) provides that the court has discretion to appoint counsel where "the court determines that the interests of justice so require . . . ."; and
WHEREAS, in Reese, the Third Circuit explained that in determining whether counsel should be appointed, a court "must first decide if petitioner has presented a nonfrivolous claim and if the appointment of counsel will benefit the petitioner and the court. Factors influencing a court's decision include the complexity of the factual and legal issues in the case, as well as the pro se petitioner's ability to investigate facts and present claims." Reese, 946 F.2d at 263-64; and
WHEREAS, the Court finds it is not in the interests of justice to appoint counsel at this time because the issues involved in this case do not appear overly complex;
THEREFORE, IT IS on this 18th day of December, 2019
ORDERED that Defendant's request for counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (ECF No. 30) be, and the same hereby is, denied; and it is finally
ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant by regular mail.