Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Hayes, 201400365 (2015)

Court: Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals Number: 201400365 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.R. MCFARLANE, K.J. BRUBAKER, D.J. SMITH Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSHUA L. HAYES CULINARY SPECIALIST SEAMAN APPRENTICE (E-2), U.S. NAVY NMCCA 201400365 SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL Sentence Adjudged: 25 July 2014. Military Judge: LtCol Jeffrey Groharing, USMC. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, USS NIMITZ (CVN 68). Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LCDR C.J. Deerwester, JAGC, USN.
More
            UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS
               COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
                    WASHINGTON, D.C.

                              Before
           J.R. MCFARLANE, K.J. BRUBAKER, D.J. SMITH
                     Appellate Military Judges

                   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                               v.

                      JOSHUA L. HAYES
    CULINARY SPECIALIST SEAMAN APPRENTICE (E-2), U.S. NAVY

                        NMCCA 201400365
                     SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 25 July 2014.
Military Judge: LtCol Jeffrey Groharing, USMC.
Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, USS NIMITZ (CVN
68).
Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LCDR C.J.
Deerwester, JAGC, USN.
For Appellant: CDR Ricardo Berry, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee: LT Amy Freyermuth, JAGC, USN.

                        17 March 2015

    ---------------------------------------------------
                    OPINION OF THE COURT
    ---------------------------------------------------

     After careful consideration of the record and the pleadings
of the parties, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved
by the convening authority. Article 66(c), Uniform Code of
Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). We concur with the single
summary assignment of error noting the scrivener’s error in the
court-martial order and direct that he supplemental court-
martial order reflect that Charge I was for a violation of
Article 85, UCMJ, vice Article 86.

                                For the Court


                                R.H. TROIDL
                                Clerk of Court

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer