Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lugodiaz, 201600317 (2016)

Court: Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals Number: 201600317 Visitors: 199
Filed: Nov. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201600317 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. JORGE L. LUGODIAZ Corporal (E-4), United States Marine Corps Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Colonel James K. Carberry, USMC. For Appellant: Commander Richard E.N. Federico, JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _ Decided 30 November 2016 _ Before C AMPBELL , H UTCHISON , and GROHARING, Appellate Military Ju
More
         U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS
             C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS
                         _________________________

                             No. 201600317
                         _________________________

                 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                 Appellee
                                     v.
                        JORGE L. LUGODIAZ
              Corporal (E-4), United States Marine Corps
                               Appellant
                        _________________________
 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

       Military Judge: Colonel James K. Carberry, USMC.
  For Appellant: Commander Richard E.N. Federico, JAGC, USN.
                For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
                     _________________________

                       Decided 30 November 2016
                        _________________________

 Before C AMPBELL , H UTCHISON , and GROHARING, Appellate Military
                               Judges
                      _________________________

   After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening
authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).
The supplemental promulgating order will reflect that only the service
of confinement in excess of 60 months was deferred until 25 August
2016, when it was then suspended pursuant to the terms of the
pretrial agreement. United States v. Crumpley, 
49 M.J. 538
, 539 (N-M.
Ct. Crim. App. 1998).


                               For the Court



                               R.H. TROIDL
                               Clerk of Court

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer