Filed: Jan. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201400229 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. ALONZO BASS III Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Equipment) Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Captain Robert J. Crow, JAGC, USN. Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Southeast, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, FL. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander George W. Lucier, JAGC, US
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201400229 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. ALONZO BASS III Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Equipment) Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Captain Robert J. Crow, JAGC, USN. Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Southeast, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, FL. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander George W. Lucier, JAGC, USN..
More
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS
C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS
_________________________
No. 201400229
_________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee
v.
ALONZO BASS III
Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Equipment) Second Class (E-5),
U.S. Navy
Appellant
_________________________
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Captain Robert J. Crow, JAGC, USN.
Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Southeast, Naval
Air Station, Jacksonville, FL.
Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander George W.
Lucier, JAGC, USN.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Doug Ottenwess, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
Decided 18 January 2018
_________________________
Before H UTCHISON , F ULTON , and S AYEGH , Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening
authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).
The current court-martial order dated 29 November 2017 fails to list all of
the offenses upon which the appellant was arraigned, along with his pleas
and the findings to those offenses,1 and subsequent modifications resulting
from the decisions of this court and action taken by the convening authority.
The supplemental court-martial order will ensure compliance with RULE FOR
1 The charged offenses at arraignment along with the pleas and findings were
included in the initial court-martial order dated 11 June 2014 and in the second
court-martial order dated 29 June 2016.
COURTS-MARTIAL 1114(c), MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL, UNITED STATES
(2016 ed.).
For the Court
R.H. TROIDL
Clerk of Court
2