Filed: May 17, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201800037 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. CHRISTIAN M. HOLMES Master-at-Arms Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Commander Arthur Gaston, JAGC, USN. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Naval Support Activity, Naples, Italy. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant K. E. Doherty- Peters, JAGC, USN. For Appellant: Commander C.
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201800037 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. CHRISTIAN M. HOLMES Master-at-Arms Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Commander Arthur Gaston, JAGC, USN. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Naval Support Activity, Naples, Italy. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant K. E. Doherty- Peters, JAGC, USN. For Appellant: Commander C. ..
More
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS
C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS
_________________________
No. 201800037
_________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee
v.
CHRISTIAN M. HOLMES
Master-at-Arms Seaman (E-3),
U.S. Navy
Appellant
_________________________
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Commander Arthur Gaston, JAGC, USN.
Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Naval Support Activity,
Naples, Italy.
Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant K. E. Doherty-
Peters, JAGC, USN.
For Appellant: Commander C. Eric Roper, JAGC, USN.
_________________________
Decided 17 M AY 2018
_________________________
Before H UTCHISON , F ULTON , and S AYEGH , Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening
authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).
The supplemental court-martial order will reflect that the appellant pleaded
and was found guilty of Charge II, and that the military judge conditionally
dismissed Specifications 1 and 2 of Charge IV.
For the Court
R.H. TROIDL
Clerk of Court