Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Holmes, 201800037 (2018)

Court: Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals Number: 201800037 Visitors: 129
Filed: May 17, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201800037 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. CHRISTIAN M. HOLMES Master-at-Arms Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Commander Arthur Gaston, JAGC, USN. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Naval Support Activity, Naples, Italy. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant K. E. Doherty- Peters, JAGC, USN. For Appellant: Commander C.
More
         U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS
             C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS
                         _________________________

                             No. 201800037
                         _________________________

                 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                 Appellee
                                     v.
                      CHRISTIAN M. HOLMES
                     Master-at-Arms Seaman (E-3),
                              U.S. Navy
                              Appellant
                       _________________________
 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

      Military Judge: Commander Arthur Gaston, JAGC, USN.
Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Naval Support Activity,
                           Naples, Italy.
Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant K. E. Doherty-
                        Peters, JAGC, USN.
       For Appellant: Commander C. Eric Roper, JAGC, USN.
                      _________________________

                          Decided 17 M AY 2018
                         _________________________

Before H UTCHISON , F ULTON , and S AYEGH , Appellate Military Judges
                       _________________________

   After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening
authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).
The supplemental court-martial order will reflect that the appellant pleaded
and was found guilty of Charge II, and that the military judge conditionally
dismissed Specifications 1 and 2 of Charge IV.
                                  For the Court



                                  R.H. TROIDL
                                  Clerk of Court

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer