Filed: Jul. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201800054 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. ETHAN A. LANDIN Personnel Specialist Third (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Leon J. Francis, USMC. Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor HI. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Commander Louis E. Butler, JAGC, USN. For Appellant: Major Maryan
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201800054 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. ETHAN A. LANDIN Personnel Specialist Third (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Leon J. Francis, USMC. Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor HI. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Commander Louis E. Butler, JAGC, USN. For Appellant: Major Maryann..
More
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS
C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS
_________________________
No. 201800054
_________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee
v.
ETHAN A. LANDIN
Personnel Specialist Third (E-4), U.S. Navy
Appellant
_________________________
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Leon J. Francis, USMC.
Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Hawaii, Pearl Harbor
HI.
Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Commander
Louis E. Butler, JAGC, USN.
For Appellant: Major Maryann N. McGuire, USMC.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
Decided 12 July 2018
_________________________
Before H UTCHISON , S AYEGH , and S TEPHENS , Appellate Military
Judges
_________________________
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening
authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).
The supplemental court-martial order will reflect that the government
withdrew the language of the greater offense of rape and dismissed it without
prejudice, to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review; thus
the appellant was not found Not Guilty of the greater offense. Record at 351.
For the Court
R.H. TROIDL
Clerk of Court