Filed: Feb. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jose D. COLINDRES Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800263 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 8 February 2019. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Libretto, USMC. Sentence adjudged 21 March 2018 by a general court-martial con- vened at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, South Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentenc
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jose D. COLINDRES Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800263 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 8 February 2019. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Libretto, USMC. Sentence adjudged 21 March 2018 by a general court-martial con- vened at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, South Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence..
More
United States Navy–Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Jose D. COLINDRES
Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201800263
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Decided: 8 February 2019.
Military Judge:
Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Libretto, USMC.
Sentence adjudged 21 March 2018 by a general court-martial con-
vened at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, South Carolina,
consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by con-
vening authority: confinement for 6 years, 1 reduction to E-1, and a
dishonorable discharge.
For Appellant:
Commander Richard E.N. Federico, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
1 The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 42 months pursu-
ant to a pretrial agreement.
United States v. Colindres, No. 201800263
Before HUTCHISON, TANG, and KOVAC
Appellate Military Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§
859(a), 866(c).
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2