Filed: Apr. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Connor J. SILVIS Aviation Boatswain’s (Equipment) Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201800295 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 5 April 2019. Military Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 12 July 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a mili- tary judge sitting alone. Sentence approved
Summary: United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Connor J. SILVIS Aviation Boatswain’s (Equipment) Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201800295 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 5 April 2019. Military Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 12 July 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a mili- tary judge sitting alone. Sentence approved b..
More
United States Navy-Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Connor J. SILVIS
Aviation Boatswain’s (Equipment) Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 201800295
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Decided: 5 April 2019.
Military Judge:
Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN.
Sentence adjudged 12 July 2018 by a special court-martial convened
at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a mili-
tary judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority:
reduction to E-1, confinement for 9 months, and a bad-conduct dis-
charge.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Commander Derek C. Hampton, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
Before FULTON, HITESMAN, and FOIL,
Appellate Military Judges.
United States v. Silvis, No. 201800295
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2