Filed: Feb. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. John J. THOMAS Aviation Boatswain’s (Handling) Third Class, U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201800310 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Decided: 28 February 2019. Military Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 12 July 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a mili- tary judge sitting alone. Sentence approved b
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. John J. THOMAS Aviation Boatswain’s (Handling) Third Class, U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201800310 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Decided: 28 February 2019. Military Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 12 July 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a mili- tary judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by..
More
United States Navy–Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
John J. THOMAS
Aviation Boatswain’s (Handling) Third Class, U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 201800310
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Decided: 28 February 2019.
Military Judge:
Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN.
Sentence adjudged 12 July 2018 by a special court-martial convened
at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a mili-
tary judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority:
reduction to E-1, confinement for 8 months, and a bad-conduct dis-
charge.
For Appellant:
Captain Scott F. Hallauer, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
Before HUTCHISON, TANG, and FOIL
Appellate Military Judges.
United States v. Thomas, No. 201800310
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2