Filed: Mar. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Anthony C. ZACHAREAS Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800329 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 7 March 2019. Military Judges: Lieutenant Colonel Emily A. Jackson-Hall, USMC (arraignment); Major Terrance J. Reese, USMC (trial). Sentence adjudged 26 July 2018 by a general court-martial convened at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judg
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Anthony C. ZACHAREAS Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800329 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 7 March 2019. Military Judges: Lieutenant Colonel Emily A. Jackson-Hall, USMC (arraignment); Major Terrance J. Reese, USMC (trial). Sentence adjudged 26 July 2018 by a general court-martial convened at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge..
More
United States Navy–Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Anthony C. ZACHAREAS
Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201800329
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Decided: 7 March 2019.
Military Judges:
Lieutenant Colonel Emily A. Jackson-Hall, USMC (arraignment);
Major Terrance J. Reese, USMC (trial).
Sentence adjudged 26 July 2018 by a general court-martial convened
at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge
sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: reduction to
E-1, confinement for 395 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Commander Mark Takla, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
Before HUTCHISON, TANG, and ELLINGTON
Appellate Military Judges.
United States v. Zachareas, No. 201800329
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2