Filed: Mar. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Aaron T. KESTLER Engineman Fireman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201800331 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 21 March 2019. Military Judge: Commander Hayes C. Larsen, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 26 July 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sit- ting alone. Sentence approved by convening autho
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Aaron T. KESTLER Engineman Fireman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201800331 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 21 March 2019. Military Judge: Commander Hayes C. Larsen, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 26 July 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sit- ting alone. Sentence approved by convening author..
More
United States Navy–Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Aaron T. KESTLER
Engineman Fireman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 201800331
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Decided: 21 March 2019.
Military Judge:
Commander Hayes C. Larsen, JAGC, USN.
Sentence adjudged 26 July 2018 by a special court-martial convened
at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sit-
ting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: confinement for
8 months * and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Commander Derek C. Hampton, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
* The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 90 days pursuant
to a pretrial agreement.
United States v. Kestler, No. 201800331
Before WOODARD, HUTCHISON, and STEPHENS
Appellate Military Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2