Filed: Mar. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Brandon M. FONTANEZBURGOS Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800354 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 21 March 2019. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Emily A. Jackson-Hall, USMC. Sentence adjudged 3 October 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sit- ting alone. Sentence approve
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Brandon M. FONTANEZBURGOS Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800354 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 21 March 2019. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Emily A. Jackson-Hall, USMC. Sentence adjudged 3 October 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sit- ting alone. Sentence approved..
More
United States Navy–Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Brandon M. FONTANEZBURGOS
Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201800354
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Decided: 21 March 2019.
Military Judge:
Lieutenant Colonel Emily A. Jackson-Hall, USMC.
Sentence adjudged 3 October 2018 by a special court-martial convened
at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sit-
ting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: confinement for
60 days and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Commander C. Eric Roper, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
Before HUTCHISON, LAWRENCE, and GERRITY
Appellate Military Judges.
United States v. FontanezBurgos, No. 201800354
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2