Filed: Apr. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jordan L. RHODES Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800357 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 5 April 2019. Military Judges: Lieutenant Colonel Brian E. Kasprzyk (arraignment); Lieutenant Colonel Mark D. Sameit (trial). Sentence adjudged 28 August 2018 by a general court-martial con- vened at Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military judge sittin
Summary: United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jordan L. RHODES Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800357 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 5 April 2019. Military Judges: Lieutenant Colonel Brian E. Kasprzyk (arraignment); Lieutenant Colonel Mark D. Sameit (trial). Sentence adjudged 28 August 2018 by a general court-martial con- vened at Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military judge sitting..
More
United States Navy-Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Jordan L. RHODES
Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201800357
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Decided: 5 April 2019.
Military Judges:
Lieutenant Colonel Brian E. Kasprzyk (arraignment);
Lieutenant Colonel Mark D. Sameit (trial).
Sentence adjudged 28 August 2018 by a general court-martial con-
vened at Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military judge
sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: confinement
for 5 years 1 and a dishonorable discharge.
For Appellant:
Major James S. Kresge, USMCR.
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
1The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 36 months pursu-
ant to a pretrial agreement.
United States v. Rhodes, No. 201800357
Before HUTCHINSON, TANG, and ATTANASIO,
Appellate Military Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2