Filed: Apr. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Alexander MORALESCASTRO Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900035 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 17 April 2019. Military Judge: Major Nute A. Bonner, USMC. Sentence adjudged 19 October 2018 by a special court-martial con- vened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening au
Summary: United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Alexander MORALESCASTRO Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900035 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 17 April 2019. Military Judge: Major Nute A. Bonner, USMC. Sentence adjudged 19 October 2018 by a special court-martial con- vened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening au-..
More
United States Navy-Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Alexander MORALESCASTRO
Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201900035
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Decided: 17 April 2019.
Military Judge:
Major Nute A. Bonner, USMC.
Sentence adjudged 19 October 2018 by a special court-martial con-
vened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of
a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening au-
thority: a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Commander Mark Takla, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
Before WOODARD, HUTCHISON, and KOVAC,
Appellate Military Judges.
United States v. Moralescastro, No. 201900035
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2