Filed: Oct. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Adam T. GOUGH Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900055 Decided: 30 October 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Major Terrance J. Reese, USMC. Sentence adjudged 11 December 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Caroli
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Adam T. GOUGH Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900055 Decided: 30 October 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Major Terrance J. Reese, USMC. Sentence adjudged 11 December 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolin..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
HITESMAN, GASTON, and ELLINGTON,
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Adam T. GOUGH
Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201900055
Decided: 30 October 2019.
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Military Judge: Major Terrance J. Reese, USMC. Sentence adjudged
11 December 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Marine
Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military
judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by the convening authority:
confinement for 135 days, 1 and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Captain W. Scott Laragy, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
1 The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 120 days pursu-
ant to a pretrial agreement.
United States v. Gough, No. 201900055
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s substan-
tial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2