Filed: Nov. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and GEIS, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tyler W. AYERS Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900107 Decided: 14 November 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Wilbur Lee, USMC. Sentence ad- judged 24 January 2019 by a general court-martial convened at Ma- rine Corps Base Camp Kaneohe
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and GEIS, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tyler W. AYERS Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900107 Decided: 14 November 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Wilbur Lee, USMC. Sentence ad- judged 24 January 2019 by a general court-martial convened at Ma- rine Corps Base Camp Kaneohe B..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
HITESMAN, GASTON, and GEIS,
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Tyler W. AYERS
Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201900107
Decided: 14 November 2019.
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Wilbur Lee, USMC. Sentence ad-
judged 24 January 2019 by a general court-martial convened at Ma-
rine Corps Base Camp Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, consisting of a military
judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to
E-1, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for 7 months,
and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander W. Scott Stoebner, JAGC,
USN.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
United States v. Ayers, No. 201900107
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s substan-
tial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2