Filed: Oct. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Erick D. LARA-RODRIGUEZ Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900188 Decided: 31 October 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Sentence adjudged 17 April 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Butler, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military judge sit
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Erick D. LARA-RODRIGUEZ Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900188 Decided: 31 October 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Sentence adjudged 17 April 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Butler, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military judge sitt..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
TANG, LAWRENCE, and RUSSELL,
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Erick D. LARA-RODRIGUEZ
Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201900188
Decided: 31 October 2019.
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Sentence adjudged 17 April 2019 by a special court-martial convened
at Marine Corps Base Camp Butler, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a
military judge sitting alone. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Mark
D. Sameit, USMC. Sentence approved by the convening authority: re-
duction to E-1, confinement for nine months, forfeiture of $1,120 per
month for 12 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent, but
may be cited as persuasive authority under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2.
_________________________
United States v. Lara-Rodriguez, No. 201900188
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2