Filed: Mar. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KING, STEPHENS, and GEIS, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Drake A. HURTADO Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Aircraft Handling) Airman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201900191 Decided: 19 March 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Ann K. Minami Sentence adjudged 6 May 2019 by a general court-martial convened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerto
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KING, STEPHENS, and GEIS, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Drake A. HURTADO Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Aircraft Handling) Airman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201900191 Decided: 19 March 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Ann K. Minami Sentence adjudged 6 May 2019 by a general court-martial convened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
KING, STEPHENS, and GEIS,
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Drake A. HURTADO
Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Aircraft Handling)
Airman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 201900191
Decided: 19 March 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Ann K. Minami
Sentence adjudged 6 May 2019 by a general court-martial convened at
Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a military
judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: 6 May 2019,
confinement for 12 months, reduction to pay grade E-1, and a bad-
conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Captain Valonne L. Ehrhardt, USMC
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
United States v. Hurtado, NMCCA No. 201900191
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, Uniform Code of Military Jus-
tice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2