Filed: Mar. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KING, STEPHENS, and BAKER, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tyre L. YOUNG Culinary Specialist Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201900312 Decided: 19 March 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Hayes C. Larsen Sentence adjudged 13 August 2019 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KING, STEPHENS, and BAKER, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tyre L. YOUNG Culinary Specialist Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201900312 Decided: 19 March 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Hayes C. Larsen Sentence adjudged 13 August 2019 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military j..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
KING, STEPHENS, and BAKER,
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Tyre L. YOUNG
Culinary Specialist Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 201900312
Decided: 19 March 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Hayes C. Larsen
Sentence adjudged 13 August 2019 by a special court-martial con-
vened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military
judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to
E-1, confinement for 12 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Commander C. Eric Roper, JAGC, USN
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
United States v. Young, NMCCA No. 201900312
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10
U.S.C. §§ 859, 866 (2012).
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2