Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Portesi, 202000001 (2020)

Court: Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals Number: 202000001 Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 20, 2020
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, STEWART, and GEIS Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Sebastian N. PORTESI Operations Specialist Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000001 Decided: 20 August 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Chad C. Temple Sentence adjudged 18 October 2019 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consistin
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.




                                Before
                     GASTON, STEWART, and GEIS
                       Appellate Military Judges

                        _________________________

                          UNITED STATES
                              Appellee

                                     v.

                    Sebastian N. PORTESI
         Operations Specialist Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy
                              Appellant

                             No. 202000001

                         Decided: 20 August 2020

    Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

                              Military Judge:
                              Chad C. Temple

 Sentence adjudged 18 October 2019 by a special court-martial con-
 vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military
 judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement
 for 120 days, reduction to E-1, a fine of $5,000, and a bad-conduct
 discharge.

                           For Appellant:
          Lieutenant Commander Shawn K. Collins, JAGC, USN

                               For Appellee:
                            Brian K. Keller, Esq.

                        _________________________

      This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
            NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
              United States v. Portesi, NMCCA No. 202000001
                            Opinion of the Court

                         _________________________

PER CURIAM:
    After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C.
§§ 859, 866.
   The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.


                               FOR THE COURT:




                               RODGER A. DREW, JR.
                               Clerk of Court




                                      2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer