Filed: Aug. 20, 2020
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, STEWART, and GEIS Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Sebastian N. PORTESI Operations Specialist Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000001 Decided: 20 August 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Chad C. Temple Sentence adjudged 18 October 2019 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consistin
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, STEWART, and GEIS Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Sebastian N. PORTESI Operations Specialist Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000001 Decided: 20 August 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Chad C. Temple Sentence adjudged 18 October 2019 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
GASTON, STEWART, and GEIS
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Sebastian N. PORTESI
Operations Specialist Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 202000001
Decided: 20 August 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Chad C. Temple
Sentence adjudged 18 October 2019 by a special court-martial con-
vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military
judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement
for 120 days, reduction to E-1, a fine of $5,000, and a bad-conduct
discharge.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Commander Shawn K. Collins, JAGC, USN
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Portesi, NMCCA No. 202000001
Opinion of the Court
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C.
§§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2