STATE v. ROBINSON, 30 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20110706370
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 16, 2011
Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2011
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge. Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, and LINDA M. VANZI, Ju
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION VIGIL, Judge. Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, and LINDA M. VANZI, Jud..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, and LINDA M. VANZI, Judge.
Source: Leagle
