RICHARDS v. NEW MEXICO DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES PLANNING COUNCIL, 31 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20120208409
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2012
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge. Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. Affirmed. IT IS SO ORDERED. MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge and TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge,
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION BUSTAMANTE, Judge. Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. Affirmed. IT IS SO ORDERED. MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge and TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, C..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
Affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge and TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, Concur.
Source: Leagle
