MACE v. NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS, 32 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20130124342
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2012
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. REVERSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge and TIMOTH
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. MEMORANDUM OPINION JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. REVERSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge and TIMOTHY..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge.
Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
REVERSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge and TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
