ROMERO v. NEW MEXICO PAROLE BOARD, 33 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20141106275
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2014
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. {1} Respondent appealed a writ of mandamus enter
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. {1} Respondent appealed a writ of mandamus entere..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge.
{1} Respondent appealed a writ of mandamus entered against it by the district court. We issued a notice of proposed disposition proposing to reverse due to the lack of service of process upon Respondent. Respondent has filed a memorandum in support of the proposed disposition, and Petitioner did not file a memorandum opposing the proposed disposition. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the notice, we reverse the district court's decision in this case.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge and JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
