CHAND v. RIGGS, 33 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20141218359
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2014
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge. {1} Plaintiff is appealing from a district court order gr
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN, Judge. {1} Plaintiff is appealing from a district court order gra..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff is appealing from a district court order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment. We issued a calendar notice on August 11, 2014, proposing to affirm. Defendant filed a memorandum in support. Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time for doing so has expired. See Rule 12-210(D)(3) NMRA. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 ("Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.").
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge and J. MILES HANISEE, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
