PETERSON v. BACA, 105. (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20161104312
Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 15, 2016
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN , Judge . {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION SUTIN , Judge . {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons s..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} AFFIRMED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge and J. MILES HANISEE, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
