STATE v. GURULE, 35 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20170118433
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2016
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI , Judge . {1} The State appeals from the district court's oral
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION VANZI , Judge . {1} The State appeals from the district court's oral ..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Judge.
{1} The State appeals from the district court's oral ruling on June 29, 2016. This Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final and appealable order. The State filed a timely notice of intent not to file a memorandum in opposition and indicated that the State does not oppose the proposed dismissal. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition, we dismiss for lack of a final and appealable order.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge and J. MILES HANISEE, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
