MULLINS v. PEREZ, 118. (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20170815482
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2017
Summary: This decision was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of non-precedential dispositions. Please also note that this electronic decision may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Supreme Court. MEMORANDUM OPINION TIMOTHY L. GARCIA , Judge . {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition
Summary: This decision was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of non-precedential dispositions. Please also note that this electronic decision may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Supreme Court. MEMORANDUM OPINION TIMOTHY L. GARCIA , Judge . {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition...
More
This decision was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of non-precedential dispositions. Please also note that this electronic decision may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Supreme Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge.
{1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. Both parties filed a memorandum indicating that they agree with our proposed disposition. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in our notice of proposed summary disposition, we reverse.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge and M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
