MARTINEZ v. MARTINEZ, CIV 09-0281 JB/KBM. (2010)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20101221a93
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 20, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2010
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed March 30, 2010 (Doc. 81)("MOO"). The MOO held that Plaintiff Patricia Martinez failed to state a viable claim against Defendants Paul Wiest and Jean Smith. See MOO at 48 ("[P. Martinez] does not state a claim that this Court can entertain against Judge Whitefield, Smith, or Wiest."). Because the MOO dismissed all claims against them, the Court
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed March 30, 2010 (Doc. 81)("MOO"). The MOO held that Plaintiff Patricia Martinez failed to state a viable claim against Defendants Paul Wiest and Jean Smith. See MOO at 48 ("[P. Martinez] does not state a claim that this Court can entertain against Judge Whitefield, Smith, or Wiest."). Because the MOO dismissed all claims against them, the Court ..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed March 30, 2010 (Doc. 81)("MOO"). The MOO held that Plaintiff Patricia Martinez failed to state a viable claim against Defendants Paul Wiest and Jean Smith. See MOO at 48 ("[P. Martinez] does not state a claim that this Court can entertain against Judge Whitefield, Smith, or Wiest."). Because the MOO dismissed all claims against them, the Court now dismisses Wiest and Smith from the case.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Paul Wiest and Jean Smith are dismissed.
Source: Leagle
