Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DUTTLE v. CHILDRESS, 10-cv-839 MCA/GBW. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20130822b51 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2013
Summary: ORDER GREGORY B. WORMUTH, Magistrate Judge. The Court met with the parties on August 19, 2013, to discuss the progress of this case in light of the resolution of related state criminal matters. Defendants have indicated their intention to file for dismissal under the doctrine set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Defendants' briefing on this matter is due by October 21, 2013, with responsive briefing to follow the normal time set forth in the Local Rules. Because such mot
More

ORDER

GREGORY B. WORMUTH, Magistrate Judge.

The Court met with the parties on August 19, 2013, to discuss the progress of this case in light of the resolution of related state criminal matters. Defendants have indicated their intention to file for dismissal under the doctrine set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Defendants' briefing on this matter is due by October 21, 2013, with responsive briefing to follow the normal time set forth in the Local Rules.

Because such motions may moot Defendants' pending motions for summary judgment (docs. 122, 124), Defendants have decided to withdraw those motions at this time. On this basis, they are hereby DENIED. Plaintiffs agree that the denial is without prejudice to their refiling if necessary after resolution of the Heck motions. The stay of discovery in this matter will remain in effect until further order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer