STATE EX REL. KING v. FASTBUCKS HOLDING CORPORATION, CIV 13-0007 JB/LFG. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20131216762
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2013
Summary: ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the State of New Mexico's Motion to Remand, filed January 14, 2013 (Doc. 29)("Motion to Remand"). The Court held a hearing on June 21, 2013. The Court will grant the Motion to Remand. IT IS ORDERED that the State of New Mexico's Motion to Remand, filed January 14, 2013 (Doc. 29)("Motion to Remand"), is granted. 1 FootNotes 1. This Order disposes of the motion. The Court will, however, at a later date issue
Summary: ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the State of New Mexico's Motion to Remand, filed January 14, 2013 (Doc. 29)("Motion to Remand"). The Court held a hearing on June 21, 2013. The Court will grant the Motion to Remand. IT IS ORDERED that the State of New Mexico's Motion to Remand, filed January 14, 2013 (Doc. 29)("Motion to Remand"), is granted. 1 FootNotes 1. This Order disposes of the motion. The Court will, however, at a later date issue a..
More
ORDER
JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the State of New Mexico's Motion to Remand, filed January 14, 2013 (Doc. 29)("Motion to Remand"). The Court held a hearing on June 21, 2013. The Court will grant the Motion to Remand.
IT IS ORDERED that the State of New Mexico's Motion to Remand, filed January 14, 2013 (Doc. 29)("Motion to Remand"), is granted.1
FootNotes
1. This Order disposes of the motion. The Court will, however, at a later date issue a memorandum opinion more fully detailing its rationale for this decision. This Order does not remand the case; the final judgment will do so.
Source: Leagle
