Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CARRILLO v. COLVIN, 1:15-00894-WPL. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20160329b89 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM P. LYNCH , Magistrate Judge . The Court, having considered Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand the Case to the Agency pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (Doc. 11), hereby grants Defendant's Motion and REMANDS the case to the Defendant for further proceedings pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), as set forth below. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). Upon remand by the Court, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an adminis
More

ORDER

The Court, having considered Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Remand the Case to the Agency pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc. 11), hereby grants Defendant's Motion and REMANDS the case to the Defendant for further proceedings pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), as set forth below. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). Upon remand by the Court, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an administrative law judge (ALJ) to review the new evidence. Final judgment shall not enter until such time as the remand proceedings are completed and the matter returns to this Court. McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 496 n.1 (10th Cir. 2006).

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer