TRUJILLO v. COLVIN, CIV 15-0936 LAM. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20160526c89
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 25, 2016
Latest Update: May 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER LOURDES A. MARTINEZ , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's unopposed motion to remand this case to Defendant pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). [ Doc. 16 ]. Having considered the motion, record of the case, and relevant law, the Court will GRANT the motion and REMAND the case to Defendant for further proceedings pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), as set forth below. See Shalala v. Schaefer , 509 U.S. 292 , 296 (1993)
Summary: ORDER LOURDES A. MARTINEZ , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's unopposed motion to remand this case to Defendant pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). [ Doc. 16 ]. Having considered the motion, record of the case, and relevant law, the Court will GRANT the motion and REMAND the case to Defendant for further proceedings pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), as set forth below. See Shalala v. Schaefer , 509 U.S. 292 , 296 (1993)...
More
ORDER
LOURDES A. MARTINEZ, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's unopposed motion to remand this case to Defendant pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). [Doc. 16]. Having considered the motion, record of the case, and relevant law, the Court will GRANT the motion and REMAND the case to Defendant for further proceedings pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), as set forth below. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's unopposed motion to remand this case to Defendant pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) [Doc. 16] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon remand by the Court, the Appeals Council will evaluate Plaintiff's request for review, evaluate Plaintiff's case, and issue appropriate action. Final judgment shall not enter until such time as the remand proceedings are completed and the matter returns to this Court. See McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 496, n.1 (10th Cir. 2006).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
