ETCITTY v. COLVIN, 1:15-00892-SMV. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20160805d33
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER FOR EXTENSION STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time (Doc. 19) to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand to Agency for Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 18), the Court having reviewed the motion and being otherwise fully advised, FINDS that the motion is well taken and is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall have until August 18, 2016, to file a response, and Pl
Summary: ORDER FOR EXTENSION STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time (Doc. 19) to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand to Agency for Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 18), the Court having reviewed the motion and being otherwise fully advised, FINDS that the motion is well taken and is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall have until August 18, 2016, to file a response, and Pla..
More
ORDER FOR EXTENSION
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
Upon consideration of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time (Doc. 19) to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand to Agency for Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum (Doc. 18), the Court having reviewed the motion and being otherwise fully advised, FINDS that the motion is well taken and is GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall have until August 18, 2016, to file a response, and Plaintiff shall have until September 1, 2016, to file a reply.
Source: Leagle
