Filed: Jul. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 14, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (DOC.48) KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant-Intervenors' Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Arizona (Motion to Transfer Venue), filed on May 23, 2016. (Doc. 48). Plaintiffs filed a response on June 9, 2016, and Plaintiff-Intervenors filed a response on June 6, 2016. (Docs. 55 and 51). Defendant-Intervenors filed a consolidated reply on June 20, 2016. (Doc. 56). D
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (DOC.48) KENNETH J. GONZALES , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant-Intervenors' Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Arizona (Motion to Transfer Venue), filed on May 23, 2016. (Doc. 48). Plaintiffs filed a response on June 9, 2016, and Plaintiff-Intervenors filed a response on June 6, 2016. (Docs. 55 and 51). Defendant-Intervenors filed a consolidated reply on June 20, 2016. (Doc. 56). De..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (DOC.48)
KENNETH J. GONZALES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant-Intervenors' Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Arizona (Motion to Transfer Venue), filed on May 23, 2016. (Doc. 48). Plaintiffs filed a response on June 9, 2016, and Plaintiff-Intervenors filed a response on June 6, 2016. (Docs. 55 and 51). Defendant-Intervenors filed a consolidated reply on June 20, 2016. (Doc. 56). Defendants take no position on the Motion to Transfer Venue.
On July 14, 2016, the Court held a telephonic hearing on the Motion to Transfer Venue. At the telephonic hearing, Karimah Schoenhut and John Buse represented Defendant-Intervenors, Raymond Nhan represented Plaintiffs, Karen Budd-Falen represented Plaintiff-Intervenors, and Nicole Smith represented Defendants.
Having considered the Motion to Transfer Venue, the accompanying briefing, the relevant law, and the argument of counsel at the telephonic hearing, and for the reasons stated on the record, the Court DENIES the Motion to Transfer Venue (Doc. 48).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
