MIRANDA v. STRIKE, LLC, CV 16-1062 JCH/WPL. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20161220e34
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM P. LYNCH , Magistrate Judge . Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(2) requires me to enter a scheduling order within 90 days after any defendant has been served with the complaint or within 60 days after any defendant has appeared, unless I find good cause for delay. In this case, there is a pending motion to remand that, if granted, would return the case to state court. (Doc. 4.) I held a Status Conference with the parties on December 16, 2016. Under the circumstances, and a
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM P. LYNCH , Magistrate Judge . Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(2) requires me to enter a scheduling order within 90 days after any defendant has been served with the complaint or within 60 days after any defendant has appeared, unless I find good cause for delay. In this case, there is a pending motion to remand that, if granted, would return the case to state court. (Doc. 4.) I held a Status Conference with the parties on December 16, 2016. Under the circumstances, and af..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM P. LYNCH, Magistrate Judge.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(2) requires me to enter a scheduling order within 90 days after any defendant has been served with the complaint or within 60 days after any defendant has appeared, unless I find good cause for delay. In this case, there is a pending motion to remand that, if granted, would return the case to state court. (Doc. 4.) I held a Status Conference with the parties on December 16, 2016. Under the circumstances, and after discussion with the parties, I find that the pending motion to remand constitutes good cause to delay entry of a scheduling order. I will enter an Initial Scheduling Order, if appropriate, upon resolution of the motion to remand. The parties may contact my chambers should circumstances change.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
